Experiential Education – What Is It?

Many people will have encountered China’s proverb:

You hear, you ignore;

You see, you remember;

You need to do it, you understand.

How true is it for people in general? Does it simply apply to a certain type of particular person, or is it more general in its applicability? Surely some individuals learn better from the ability to hear things or from discovering things than from being productive – we are all different.

If you look at the work of David Kolb in the early 1980s, it is clear that whilst men and women have different learning styles, there’s also a cycle of experiential understanding that applies to us all. We could now see these concepts being put into practice as we adopted problem-based learning and recognised the need for lifelong understanding.

How We Learn

Using concepts from John Dewey, the particular ‘father’ of experiential education and learning (1938), his book, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Way to obtain Learning and Development, discusses the question ‘What will be learning? ‘ which he or she addresses on a psychological, philosophical, and sociological level. Fundamentally, Kolb shows how understanding is a dynamic process that will never cease during their life.

He set out any four-stage learning spiral in which immediate or real experiences (feeling) provide a time frame for observations and glare (watching). These are then merged and distilled into cut concepts (thinking) which can be tried hard to test (doing), developing new experiences. From this spiral, he then identified four learning styles, each of which will combine two of the development of the cycle. Each of you naturally prefers a certain sole different learning style, a product of two things: how you approach a task (the control continuum) and our over emotional response to it (the conception continuum).

The idea of the learning model that Kolb proposed is likewise supported by the ideas connected with other such researchers, including Honey and Mumford surrounding the same time, who talked about finding out styles in terms of Activists, Reflectors, Theorists, and Pragmatists, all over again pointing out that people, whilst persons will all have a chosen style they will tend to study at different times out of all different ways.

This research in learning styles is then linked to the ideas of Sped up Learning, that deal with finding out is more than just an intellectual brain thing but a total body experience, using every one of the senses and the full range and depth of style. The idea is that when the way that you are taught closely matches the means you like to learn, results strengthen significantly, and the time you take to learn is minimized, hence accelerated learning.

This concept has been recognised in mainstream education for several years, with teachers aiming to cater to all three groups; visual, aural and kinaesthetic learners.

Therefore some people specifically learn far better from doing things. Still, people with different preferences regarding learning styles can also study from doing if the whole Kolb’s learning cycle is roofed. The big plus seems to be about the recall. After three months, it truly is reckoned that people who were simply told things can recollect 10% of the learning, people that were told and proven can remember 30+%, but people that were told, shown and also experienced it for themselves can certainly still recall two-thirds of whatever they learnt.

This implies that learning by experiencing is a crucial way to do it for all. For the folks for whom the activity is just not necessarily in their preferred finding out style, there must be many means of completing the elliptical. This is where the practical experience may need to be front-loaded and reviewed.

Learning By Experiences

The Royal Voile Association talks about Brief-Task-Debrief about their coaching scheme instructions. Every task needs to be revealed and then assessed and assessed afterwards. The British Raft Union go a step, even more, when they teach coaches to apply the concept of IDEAS as a structure for their teaching; Introduce your site or skill, Demonstrate the item (visual learning), Explain the item (auditory learning), Activity (kinaesthetic learning) and then Summarise (reviewing to cement the recollections and thus the learning).

This kind of process works well for purchasing hard skills like embarking and canoeing, but is that all that experiential learning is perfect for? This can all join the review. In some cases, this would merely be a review of how well we achieved our goals of learning a certain paddle stroke or wind-surfing manoeuvre. There is, however, for taking this further and delving into how participants felt. This can then lead to further researching the participants themselves, what they learn, how they feel in numerous situations, their internal strengths, and so on. This is the link to all other stuff, rather than simply the activity getting carried out.

Activity without expression is deemed by several to be useless. Certainly, the learning involved, I would confess, is of only minimal value. The standalone exercise is fine if all you want is an ‘experience’. This brings us to the idea of a ‘yeehaa’ great time, which can be great for bringing folks together through shared knowledge and developing stronger genuine friendships and help. The addition of reviewing does not eliminate this; it health supplements it with a different understanding.

Experiences We Can Learn From

Where do these experiences happen, and what must they require? The simple answer to that could be everywhere and anything. People who discuss are often under the misconception that experiential learning must happen outdoors, possibly because they know me as a possible outdoor trainer. I am from pains to stress, though, that individuals can experience wherever they can at any given time and that learning will take place from anything we do. I believe that whatever from card games played within the table, or such low-level classic exercises as a spider’s web through to an experience increasing a high ropes course as well as Eiger can all give useful learning points whenever we are willing to work our means through the reviewing process your kids.

It’s not essential to be wintry or wet, whatever your instructors told you in the past! Neither is it necessary to be scared witless. I would argue that though these extremes can provide the same experiences and learning, they are usually prone to be riddled with adverse memories, which obstruct sustainable learning. Most of us seek to forget the horror at the end, blot it from all of our memories, and therefore the learning dissolves with it. Learning that I can do really hard things is great when I know that it completely worries me jumping for the trapeze. In my opinion, it is harder to connect to do really tough things at my workplace, mainly because I know I hated the item the first time.

If I have a collection of positive recollections of working with my friends on tasks that, if successful or not, were tremendous fun, I am more likely to take into account the lessons. I will have a graphic in my head to be able to go wrong at just one point because we decided not to listen, and another graphic of the successful tasks everywhere we respected each other in addition to communicating well. The team concept that we need to communicate considerably better and have more respect for is something I can latch on to and repeat back at work.

This experiential element can thus be included in various training courses, lessons or seminars. Twenty a few minutes spent playing a game which reinforces lessons learnt is frequently better received than an extra twenty minutes of being discussed. Still, more importantly, it is best retained. Time spent comprehending by doing is always better than battling to get your head around any theoretical concept. Learning simply by exploring a topic for yourself and then getting your specific questions is superior to a subject-matter expert hinting at what they think you need to know.

All these concepts involve an experience of some sort. Some of the experiences may map very closely to the workplace and will require little or no hard work on the trainer’s part for that learning to be transferable. Several games are more remote and may need careful reviewing to be able to draw out the appropriate lessons. Here is the differentiation between a coach who can give you a fun exercise time and one who can help you discover sustainable lessons you can preserve as you return to work.

Restrictions to Learning by Knowledge

What are the limits of exactly what do be learnt by knowledge? Well, nothing really; however, some topics lend themselves a lot more to the idea than other individuals. For example, as mentioned above, practical capabilities like sailing are best learnt by doing. Nevertheless, even the theoretical aspects are usually learnt through games in addition to exercises rather than being talked about all the time. And suppose you can find some theoretical input expected. In that case, there are also interactive chalk talk techniques that can be used to contain people in their own

finding out experience. Lessons about yourself and your potential are certainly a basic area for experiential finding out since it is something that you can be the sole subject-matter expert- other people maybe have experience. Still, only you are efficient at knowing yourself, although every one of us has blind spots that must be removed. It is rare, nevertheless, to have friends who can not only tell us where our shutter spots are but undertake it in a way that we are willing to pay attention to. How much more important is it to experience it for yourself where we merely ought to remember our experience?

It is also a good way of learning about others, and interactions can be more readily experienced than explained. For that reason, team building is often best any time done as actively as possible. The distinction between idea and team bonding experience is the mastering quality since that is the focus. Outlined on our site always have as a soft go for my sessions that people take advantage of the sessions and that they can have amusing, but not at the expense of the learning. The fun and company simply make it more enjoyable, plus the shared experiences are then the topic of conversation per se. If the dinner table conversation with the participants revolves around what they mastered rather than merely what they did, I feel it is a job congratulation.

Further to this, any specific theoretical material can be educated interactively if enough care is taken with the training style. Games, exercises along with simulations can all be created to make people more lively as they explore and learn about subjects as diverse for a reason the developmental stages of staff through to the biblical principles involving behaviour, from the perceived benefits associated with a new product to the significant aspects of situational leadership.

The boundaries on what can be learnt are simply in the mind of the dog trainer, or the learner, which gives to one important barrier for you to learning that is true involving any kind of learning system rapid it only works as well as the student is willing to let it function. If people do not would like to learn, then there is no way you may make them. However, we can allow it to be more fun for them to learn. We can create situations where training is experienced. We can offer situations where people participate positively and can’t because they can easily be distracted. We can help people experience it for themselves.

admin